The probability of evolution occurring and man evolving is somewhat like placing a bunch of watch parts into a jar. Evolution suggests shaking the jar for a million years and hoping that the parts will come together just right to form a working watch. Even if watch parts could survive the shaking for million years, life forms have a fairly short life span on the evolutionary time scale. How could then the fairly common male-female pairing of higher life forms ever come about? How could an evolutionary mutating organism (say a mammal), possibly find an exact complementary mate that would continue the process within its short life span.
Evolution has no solution or palatable answer for the development of male-female pairing. The Bible addresses the issue simply: "God created them, male and female." As an infinite being of infinite creative abilities, He could perfectly match complementary organs and functionality at the instant of creation.
In order for the higher life forms to evolve into the male-female pair within the life span of an organism, a complementary organism would have to be found with which to mate. Then an evolutionary mutation would have to occur in which the mutant was fertile and found a complementary mutated fertile entity with which to mate. Then the offspring of this union would also have to be fertile to perpetuate the mutated species. This process could only take one of two steps. Either the entity was
Let's take a look at these two progressions and see if we can observe any possibilities and transitions in all the tens of thousands of species throughout the world.
For the transition from low level asexual organism to a higher level single sex creature, the mutation process could potentially progress in two fashions.
These two progressions are shown in the following tables:
Asexual State |
Single Sex State |
Fertility status |
100% |
0% |
Fertile |
90% |
10% |
Sterile |
80% |
20% |
Sterile |
70% |
30% |
Sterile |
60% |
40% |
Sterile |
50% |
50% |
Sterile |
40% |
60% |
Sterile |
30% |
70% |
Sterile |
20% |
80% |
Sterile |
10% |
90% |
Sterile |
0% |
100% |
Fertile |
Asexual State |
Single Sex State |
Fertility status |
100% |
0% |
Fertile |
100% |
10% |
Sterile |
100% |
20% |
Sterile |
100% |
30% |
Sterile |
100% |
40% |
Sterile |
100% |
50% |
Sterile |
100% |
60% |
Sterile |
100% |
70% |
Sterile |
100% |
80% |
Sterile |
100% |
90% |
Sterile |
100% |
100% |
Both being fully asexual and having fully developed sex organs of one gender |
90% |
100% |
Sterile |
80% |
100% |
Sterile |
70% |
100% |
Sterile |
60% |
100% |
Sterile |
50% |
100% |
Sterile |
40% |
100% |
Sterile |
30% |
100% |
Sterile |
20% |
100% |
Sterile |
10% |
100% |
Sterile |
0% |
100% |
Fertile |
As shown in both the above tables, no in-between states that are fertile have ever been observed to our knowledge. Organisms in transition are always sterile, or if fertile (which has never observed), would most likely be so removed from a complementary developing creature that it would die prior to encountering its mate, thus breaking the evolutionary mutating process.
Let's look at the potential transition processes for a low level hermaphrodite to a higher order single sex creature. The following table shows a possible progression (over thousands of years of course) from having both fully functional male and female components within the organism, to having only one set of sexual organs. Of course, during those eons, the transitional hermaphrodite has to find a fertile complementary mate with which to reproduce a mutant to continue the evolutionary process.
Hermaphrodite to Male |
Hermaphrodite to Female |
||||
Male Component |
Female Component |
Fertility |
Male Component |
Female Component |
Fertility |
100% |
100% |
Fertile |
100% |
100% |
Fertile |
100% |
90% |
Sterile |
90% |
100% |
Sterile |
100% |
80% |
Sterile |
80% |
100% |
Sterile |
100% |
70% |
Sterile |
70% |
100% |
Sterile |
100% |
60% |
Sterile |
60% |
100% |
Sterile |
100% |
50% |
Sterile |
50% |
100% |
Sterile |
100% |
40% |
Sterile |
40% |
100% |
Sterile |
100% |
30% |
Sterile |
30% |
100% |
Sterile |
100% |
20% |
Sterile |
20% |
100% |
Sterile |
100% |
10% |
Sterile |
10% |
100% |
Sterile |
100% |
0% |
Fertile |
0% |
100% |
Fertile |
Based upon scientific observation of existing life forms, we come to the same conclusion as before. As shown in both the above tables, no in-between states that are fertile have ever been observed. Organisms in transition are always sterile, or if fertile (never observed), would be so removed from a complementary developing mate that it would die prior to encountering its mate, thus breaking the evolutionary mutating process, again supposedly takes thousands of years.
For an asexual lower life form to "evolve" to a slightly higher hermaphroditic life form, the following potential process would be need to be taken.
Hermaphroditic Status |
|||
Asexual State |
Male State |
Female State |
Fertility status |
100% |
0% |
0% |
Fertile |
100% |
10% |
10% |
Sterile |
100% |
20% |
20% |
Sterile |
100% |
30% |
30% |
Sterile |
100% |
40% |
40% |
Sterile |
100% |
50% |
50% |
Sterile |
100% |
60% |
60% |
Sterile |
100% |
70% |
70% |
Sterile |
100% |
80% |
80% |
Sterile |
100% |
90% |
90% |
Sterile |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Sterile - Having both fully functional Hermaphrodite organs and Asexual characteristics |
90% |
100% |
100% |
Sterile |
80% |
100% |
100% |
Sterile |
70% |
100% |
100% |
Sterile |
60% |
100% |
100% |
Sterile |
50% |
100% |
100% |
Sterile |
40% |
100% |
100% |
Sterile |
30% |
100% |
100% |
Sterile |
20% |
100% |
100% |
Sterile |
10% |
100% |
100% |
Sterile |
0% |
100% |
100% |
Fertile |
Again, the same observations and conclusions are reached. All in-between life forms are sterile. How possibly could the male-female complementary partnership evolve? Especially for thousands of species and animal groups?
The answer is pretty obvious. Genesis 5:2 states: "He (God) created them male and female and blessed them."
For more a few more texts on this subjects, click here.
Complete Creation compilation (intro) - Evidence for Creation page, click here.